Tag: philosophy

Posted on

Racine Andromaque

The representation of Jean Racine’s “Andromaque” in Brussels at the Theâtre des Martyrs in 2025 has been an interesting choice, because the revival of a 17th century tragedy dealing with the intricacies of the Greek and Trojan war (mostly remembered for the Trojan horse). Jean Racine turned French theatre back to tragedies with his Andromaque (Résumé and analysis in French!), rather than the comedies or tragi-comedies of previous great authors like Molière.
The literary analysis of Andromaque by Roland Barthes (“Sur Racine”, 1963) identified 3 separate locations: chamber, anti-chamber and exteriors. The real power seems to live in the chamber as the place of respect, but also terror. (Compare also Mithridate). The anti-chamber is the place of diplomacy and the place of exchange of ideas, information and strategies. The exterior world is mostly closed off through walls or balconies as views from above. For Barthes this “symbolizes” even the prison inside or the pure heroic life inside the walls.
Besides this 21th century interpretation of 17th century theatre, Racine is remembered for his tragic love stories where A loves B, but B loves C and, maybe C falls in love with A. (Compare Robert Horville, 1991) The Condorcet paradox (Science of it) described only formally in the 18th century enlightenment, many decades later, had proven mathematically that such combinations of personal preferences are impossible to resolve. Hence, these confusions are great stuff for tragedies to evolve live on stage.  

 

Posted on

Social Anthropology

Dina Dreyfus, married several years to Claude Lévi-Strauss, has shared with Claude the long anthropological expedition to Brazil in the 1930s. They jointly studied the social organization of indigenous people across Brazil. Their abundant notes of field studies have now been digitized and the BNF is making this accessible.
Additionally, an exhibition on these field studies reveals the close collaboration of both partners. Returning to France in 1939 meant that soon after the return due to their Jewish decent had to interrupt their academic careers in France and some notebooks were lost during the Nazi occupation of France. After the war both separated and Claude Lévi-Strauss embarked on the drafting of the structuralist theory, Dina became influential in the field of the philosophy of education and teaching philosophy herself.
Besides all these lasting achievements, the exhibition shows the typewriter which had accompanied them for many years. The German language layout is quite remarkable as this asked for an additional mental versatility in putting their thoughts and experiences into the form of a manuscript. According to Claude Lévi-Strauss the use of this technical device allowed him to detach himself emotionally from his analytical work.
(Image: Exhibit: typewriter Claude Lévi-Strauss, BNF 2025-10)

Posted on

Ethics in Photography

Yes, you read this correctly. This entry is about the ethics in photography, not about the much more popular discussion about the aesthetics in photography, which fills thousands of books on fashion, architecture, minerals, flowers, animals, landscapes and … you name it. Sensationalism works in photography. The more spectacular an image, the more likes you’ll get in any media, social or so-called social as well as traditional ones. Sex and crime are popular subjects, better framed as objects, as well. The basic idea of what constitutes unethical imagery or photography is broadly defined by the principle of exclusion, i.e. what is not ethical in photography. Let’s add to this inventory the conditions of production: exploitation of the subjects, be they persons or animals or even authorship like violations of intellectual property rights by AI.
Regulations and legal frameworks clarify many of those issues, enforcement of these rules are yet another element related to the ethics in photography. Global warming and the loss of biodiversity has made us aware that the respect of natural resources is also an aspect in the ethics in photography. Travelling long distances by plane just to get a few shots in the Himalaya region, if there have been thousands of (better?) images produced, printed, distributed before, is not sustainable for our planet as a whole. Invading protected areas, like natural bio-reservoirs, to take a few shots especially of rare plants and flowers maybe nice to look at, but the longer-term consequences add up to a loss of biodiversity for us all, in particular for later generations.
These considerations are different from “aniconism”, because they originate in a humanist foundation of ethics not concerned with any depiction or idolatry of images. The historical roots of any ethics in photography have long shadow into today’s practice of photography as well.
(Image: The framing of ethics of photography with reference to John Cage “Silence“)

Posted on

Marc Aurel Memorials

The depiction of Marc Aurel as Emperor has become a trade mark in the history of art and politics. As an emperor with good horse riding skills, Marc Aurel was the first emperor to be portrayed as riding on a horse without saddle whilst, of course, in perfect skill to master the horse and give orders or strategic commands. Many subsequent emperors, Napoleon or Friedrich have had their power positions “immortalised” as such, which served at the same time to make them appear taller and “in command” of something.
Travelling by horse has  also been for a long time the fastest mode of transport, yet another symbol of social status used in media campaigns of those times. The memorials in honour of Marc Aurel had already during the ancient time the function to transmit an image, the emperor wanted history to keep in mind, rather than the view of ordinary people in the Roman empire. Memorials of political leaders have been a demonstration of power for centuries before and for centuries to come.
(Image: Trier Marc Aurel exhibitions 2025-9)

Posted on

Marc Aurel critics

In the literature on and about Marc Aurel (Brenan 1882, pp. 484) the end of the ancient world is mentioned frequently. This refers to the beginning of the end of the Roman empire and the rise of Christianity to be become more influential. What caused the decline? The nepotism in the governance structure through the placement of family members to influential positions and as successor alienated many followers who previously believed in the high moral standards advocated by Marc Aurel.
Justifications of superiority by social origin are standard at the time of writing, but Marc Aurel did not see the potential of a more equitable distribution of offices. Women were relegated to subordinate or no public positions and are not mentioned with respect to  the importance of reasoning or social competence either, none but one in his acknowledgements (Book 1). The discrepancy between the formulation of virtues as well as ideal standards versus own practices of hierarchical leadership, recourse to slavery and brutal upholding of the empire should not go unmentioned.

Posted on

Marc Aurel Advice

The study of Marc Aurel’s Meditations offers advice on how to conduct one’s private and public life. The role as advisor or teacher is an important part of his writings, albeit quite indirect. In going back to Book 1 and his acknowledgements of his own advisors, teachers and good examples indicate the motivation and intention to write down his meditations. “People exist for one another. You can instruct, or endure, them” (Book 8, paragraph 59, see also Barrientos 2020). Marc Aurel does not shrug away from the treatment of general concepts of humanity like justice. In his view “… justice entails the exercise of wisdom, kindness, and fairness in our relationships with others both individually and collectively.” This includes already tolerance as a part of justice as in Book 4 paragraph 2, according to Robertson (2020). The idealistic view of humanity, following Platon’s philosophy and other Stoic authors, still serves as a benchmark against which many leaders are measured today (compare Le Monde 2025-9-25 p. 26).

Posted on

Marc Aurel Book 12

The closing book of Marc Aurel’s Meditations is taking issue with his own posterity. As a guideline for others, he formulated the claim not to care so much more about the opinions of others, but to stand by own reasoning and trust in one’s own opinion. “I have ofetn wondered how it is that everyone loves himself more than anyone else, but rates his own judgement of himself below that of others. … So it is that we have more respect for what our neighbours will think of us than we have for ourselves.” (Paragraph 4, Penguin Classics).
Of course, in the age of “philosophy as discourse” (Habermas), we are used to criticism of books and their authors. For the emperor philosopher this was less obvious, albeit the Socratic tradition of exchanges between teachers and their scholars was a kind of precursor of 20th century philosophy.
His writings in ancient Greek, however, remained little known and debated until its first Latin publication. Ever since, it has been a prominent work on ethics and leadership. The exhibition in Trier featured the copy of Helmut Schmidt, as the long reach of stoic writings on virtues and leadership.
(Image: Stadtmuseum Trier, Model of Villa in Welschbillig)

Posted on

Marc Aurel Book 11

Throughout the Meditations, Marc Aurel concerns himself with the idea and importance of the common good. Based on his experience as Consul and Roman Emperor, the common good is of primary concern. At least in his thinking and writing these concerns play a very prominent role just like the “social“. In order to ensure his own successor, as described by Katherine Kennedy (2020 through www.classicalwisdom.com) he was only the 2nd Roman Emperor  to appoint a biological heir as his successor, which met a lot of criticism already at that time. Nevertheless, in his philosophical thinking and leadership guidelines he cherished the common good above all. “Have I done something for the common good? Then I too have benefited. Have this thought always ready to hand: and no stopping.” (Book 11 paragraph 4, Penguin Classics edition). This is in contrast to the predominant utilitarian thoughts many centuries later where the pursuit of your own benefit will further the benefit for society. The reversal of the logical sequence in later thoughts is particularly remarkable as well. The process of individualisation seems to be another additional factor in the lack of concern for the common good in the 21st century. Raising the awareness to further the common good is a continued challenged in most societies.

Posted on

Marc Aurel Book 10

Book 10 offers some referrals to previous books and topics: Marc Aurel defends a wholistic vision as in book 10 paragraph 17: “Keep constantly in your mind an impression of the whole of time (χρόνον) and the whole of existence (οὐσίαν)…” (Penguin Classics version, also in Greek original/French translation). In the same vein, he wants all this knowledge and considerations to be “actionable”. This reads in his words: “No more roundabout discussion of what makes a good man. Be one!” (book 10, paragraph 16 in the same two editions). As the late Marc Aurel’s writings progress, he becomes even more “exigent” in the sense of demanding ever higher standards (of himself). “Whole-ism” paired with a request to, nevertheless, be ready for action at any time is not only a high cognitive demand, but also a reminder to leave procrastination behind. The virtue of a stoic leadership style remains an ambitious challenge.
(Image: Trier Exhibitions on Marc Aurel, 2025-9)

Posted on

Marc Aurel Book 9

For students of economics or business the paragraph 10 provides an interesting precursor of the concept of capital, interest and maybe even on human capital: „Man, god, and the universe all bear fruit, each in its own due season. No matter if common use confines the strict sense of ‚bearing fruit‘ to vines and the like. Reason too has its fruit, both universal and particular: other things grow from it which share its own nature.“  (Penguin edition) There are so many examples of the fruits that have grown on the trees of knowledge that we have become accustomed to the idea and continue to reap the benefits of those vines. Of course, some of these fruits have turned out to be more of a curse than a blessing. We seem to neglect the wise judgment which Marc Aurel mentioned along with the use of logic. (Also in this version Link)