Online publishing offers much more flexible forms of publishing. Even traditional book formats can be organized in new ways. Instead of a fixed sequence of chapters, paragraphs or blog entries, the sequence becomes a matter of choice. Either in the author’s hand or in the hands of readers, the cruising through content allows very individual experiences of what still is the same content. Just as learning, which is ultimately an individualized process, the reading or scrolling through content creates singular experiences with the content. Several choices of more in depth reading should keep the reader interesting to dig further along the personal knowledge trajectory according to own prior interests.
The motivation of a person to read depends on the reader’s own interests and current situation or context. The “state of mind” constitutes the willingness to stop at certain pages or entries. The search function, keywords or tags allow to deviate from an author’s intended sequence of chapters. An online textbook has easy entry and exit points. They are not predetermined. The risk, however, is that the reader stops at a point without loose ends, somehow in expectation of a conclusion of a succinct summary. That’s probably the easiest job for any AI system, based on a series of entries.
However, the joy of the journey through knowledge gets lost through the use of AI as a short cut. Just like physical exercise rewards you with additional strength, mental exercise keeps us healthy.
Traditional predefined sequences – like books, e-books or flip-books are also available on this webpage either through the post archive or the continuously growing books, e-books or flip-books page.
Knowledge Work
In the social sciences the term knowledge work defines the group of professions that deal with and deal in knowledge. Most of them are in academia, but there are many other professions like ICT professionals or lawyers that used to shuffle paper who now work all digital. Hence the relatively new addition to the sociological vocabulary is “mobile knowledge work”. We, and yes I am part of this group, can do our job from almost any place with a stable internet connection. Breda Gray et al. (2020, Made to work: Mobilising contemporary worklives.) highlight the importance of gender considerations when we study these new forms of work. Similarly, social class and cultures of more or less trust are thriving for independence. This will play a role in who choses these new forms of work. The digital technology enterprises, media and social media workers are and will be the forerunners of this change. The education sector and academics in general have followed suit.
The issue of autonomy has also received some attention by the authors and this is likely to be a big challenge to standard work relationships as we knew them before the digital turn and the Covid-19 pandemic. The mobile knowledge workers were the first to insist on change of work practices, there will be other professions that will strive for greater autonomy of various kinds.

Essais
The essays written by Montaigne in the 16th century have re-established a way of writing on philosophy in short digestable small essays. These short essays became very popular at the time and the new technology of the 16th century invented by Gutenberg, the printing press, facilitated the wider spread of literature. Even Montaigne himself re-wrote on printed versions of his own work. The early adoption of the printing technology helped to spread literature in your own mother tongue rather than only in Greek or Latin for the clergy. Montaigne’s format of rather short notes, without a huge masterplan or encyclopedic approach, took readers along on the journey of scepticism, think on your own. Enabling the reader, how to doubt received wisdom, became an important milestone in the history of ideas and philosophy. Referring back to Seneca for example is also interesting as this Greek philosopher dealt with the topic of wisdom in his later life combining knowledge from different different scientific disciplines. Free independent judgment and the ability to argue and take different perspectives became later known as the foundation of relativism. It is still an important way to enable people to take and defend their own perspectives, just like the critical version of colonialism in the exhibition “Indigo waves“. Lichtenberg’s Aphorisms are another example of the independent mind writing down his ad hoc impressions as pieces of larger picture or puzzle. The literary puzzle needs several attempts to assemble the thoughts. Common to these writers is the freedom of thought and expression, still not a given in many parts of the world today. I would probably imagine the doubt as the origin independent thinking. “I doubt, therefore I am” would do much good not only in totalitarian countries. Rediscovering the usefulness of doubting as foundation to take new perspectives and to find new solutions is worth it.