dynamics – Schoemann

Who commands our time? Who commands your time? Both macro- and micro-level analyses of power relationships related to time need to be investigated. Time policies are most obvious when it comes to regulations of working time, permissions of business hours or so-called bank holidays. On the micro or individual level, it is often the question of who spends more time on work, care and repair. Hourly wage rates have been claimed by economists to guide or decide societal time spent on one or the other activity. An extension of this rationale with an overriding objective of happiness might considerably change the impact of power relationships on time. Longer time perspectives on health shall also shift the view of how power impacts the time spent on various activities. Time sovereignty is a precious value in its own right.
The power play between employers and employees keeps shifting the balance, albeit the overall trend over the last 100 years has been towards a reduction of working time and increased time sovereignty of employees as a form of democratization of working life. This constitutes one form to share the benefits of productivity gains over decades as well. (Image clock on Berlin City Council building on labor day 2025).

There is nothing more confusing that multiple clocks that are ticking away without being synchronized, which means, they ought to show the same time. A medical and social science perspective on multiple clocks, however, builds on the fact the different social processes run with different speed, i.e. multiple clocks are ticking in parallel but one may be more advanced than the other. The study of longevity has recently acknowledged that each human organ is aging at its own speed and if the time to failure is close for the liver, the time until problems of your heart might still be far off. Overall longevity is determined by the time to failure of a major organ, despite the fact that multiple clocks of organs are running in parallel.
The can be observed for social processes where, for example, the timing of unemployment or retirement might be dependent on a parallel process of a household dissolution causing a peak in stress. Overall life satisfaction, therefore, depends largely on multiple clocks that might be running in a synchronized or not-synchronized manner. Hence, we all live with multiple clocks ticking inside us and around us. The illusion is, to believe that time is just a single, unique measure.