Tag: defence

Posted on

Better infrastructure

It doesn’t need much explanation to advocate better infrastructure. Even if we rarely agree on what constitutes better infrastructure, the lack of infrastructure is felt quickly. Almost everything we use on a daily basis like water, food or transportation rely on large scale infrastructure to facilitate individual uses. Companies settle where they spot good locations, most of them are related to infrastructure as well. The basics about infrastructure is the public versus private provision of such infrastructure and related services. Even a country’s defense hinges on good infrastructure to be able to respond quickly at the place where the defense is most needed. Telecommunication and satellites have been recent innovations in the field of infrastructure. Security and cybersecurity in particular are a critical component of infrastructure. The topic is huge. The means to address these issues are likewise of daunting scale. Therefore, it is all the more important to address these challenges.

Posted on

Archers destroyed

In the attempt to explain modern warfare to people, the Roman and medieval languages are staging a comeback. The archers have found their way from warfare into art history and back again. George Barros explains recent defensive actions by Ukrainian military forces as the strategy to put the archers out of power rather than the arches.
Destroyed or unfit air planes can no longer launch missiles or bombs. The Russian reserves are, however, fairly numerous, but the air strikes on the modern archers have demonstrated an astonishing military intelligence on the Ukrainian side. The technological advances of the Ukrainian military services may shift the balance or raise the costs of war to Russia, considerably.

Posted on

More Battles

In 2025 we continue with the same battles as in the previous year. However, the way armies fight military battles has evolved. New types of weapons like drones have entered the stage. These precision weapons (Horowitz, 2024) have the advantage to be not only less costly than other heavy mass and costly artillery, they can also be guided in swarms to their targets. A further advantage is the steering of drones needs differently qualified persons rather than advancing with heavy armored vehicles on battlefields. Upskilling of defense forces is an important side effect. Jamming technology of radio frequencies was applied before, nowadays this has turned into a crucial defense strategy to intercept and derail drones and rockets off their intended targets.
Other than heavy weight arms, even laser beams enter the arsenal of weapons, if targets are sufficiently static in nature. These high-energy beams are still more in the research and testing realm rather than used on the battle field, but it becomes clear that research capacities play and played an important role throughout military history. The next generation of robots, not only in production processes, but more those walking on the battlefields is likely to change wars to less manned interventions. The technological innovations shall further move the spiral of new generations of weapons forward. Fewer soldiers, but more robots in the air, at sea and on the ground might increase the risks of “restrained”, less costly, but longer duration conflicts across the globe.
I always thought of robots as rescue robots to save lives. The flip side of the coin, however, is destruction before rescue as well. Technology can be put to both purposes. It is us who decide, which one takes the upper hand.