To reach a balance, to keep the balance or one’s balance, this highlights the process nature of balancing. Even the old tool of a balance (scale for weights) very much reflects the evening-out of the balancing process. It seems like a temporary balance most of the time. We might evolve from one level to another one. Especially imagining ourselves on a (body weight) balance in the morning and then throughout the year or years, this appears like a dynamic trajectory. The nature and/or nurture connection is evident. Beware to search for synonyms of “balance” on the internet. You get more than 3000 synonym (Link) meanings and 30 suggestions for definitions (Link) to contemplate on. I like the nice physical experience of balance and the simple (a bit nerdy) explanation of it. Economist get very excited about balance of payments and the ways to achieve equilibrium or equilibria. Balancing personal accounts can be a bit painful at times, but balancing in the arts gets our imagination going. Dancing is about balance most of the time. Playing with your own balance, the balance when 2 or more persons are in action, how not to be absorbed by such experiences. In music, the balance is a primary issue since Bach’s “wohltemperiertes Klavier” and balance and tension are the origin of much jazz. An image or photo might be balanced, certainly architecture is playing with or restricted by balancing acts. Herta Müller’s “Atemschaukel” has thrown us off balance for a while. History we study often with a concern for a balance of power. In peace and war times, the balance of power within and between countries or superpowers are a long-lasting research issue. At times when this balance is at risk or completely out-of-balance we are deeply concerned about the return of a balanced situation. Babies and children draw comfort from being balanced. Adults as well. Let’s try again (chanson). (balance22-venice -video). 
A for Action
The A is everywhere. A is the beginning of the Alphabet, Google is our new Alphabet, we just have not realised it. A simple A-rating in investment is not good enough, AA or AAA is the goal. All this calls for ACTION. Do not be stopped in your action by reading on “Action theory” by Parsons, Rational action is the basis of most economic reasoning before the behavioural turn of economics. It is commonly acknowledged now, that rational action might not always be as rational as we want to believe it is. “Frame selection” as theory to explain our choice of action is fashionable in the social sciences. Transforming values and intentions into actions is a big challenge. Many jokes turn around this issue, like intentions to get up early in the morning. Find out whether you are an actionable leader. You should have at least a few “actionable items” on your to-do-list. Of course, Microsoft recommends actionable items to improve our productivity while spending hours on emails.
Well, early philosophers already distinguished between “vita contemplativa” and “vita activa“. A lot is about finding the right balance here and Hannah Arendt’s differentiation of active life in labor, work and action. She puts emphasis on action as a way to distinguish ourselves from others. The same thought might lead to very different actions. Hence, acting on one’s belief or values could lead to very different policies for just 2 persons. Action Artists perform even in inaction. We are back to basic questions of democratic procedures as a form to moderate between different opinions or possible actions. Lots of other A-words come up now: ambiguity, anxiety, alienation, affirmation, affect, affection. In Greek, A might be associated with Apollo, In German with the famous “Angst”, but French is overriding all this with “Amour”.
X for Xeno
Xeno is the root of the much more commonly used words of xenophobia or xenophilia. Xenos, in its Greek original, just means guest, strangeness or coming from another place. With the awareness of coming from another place or dreaming of another place we create the link Xeno-link to migration. Everybody knows about migration experiences, be they just from one village to the neighbouring one, rural- urban migration or beyond language or legal boundaries. Interesting new perspectives on the issue are rare. To view migration from an optimism or pessimism angle is a bit like a Picasso-like view on the century-old topic. Beyond out-migration and in-migration there is the population left behind in the villages, regions, countries or nations. Optimism seems to guide the outmigrants. Realizing to become viewed and stigmatised as an immigrant might reduce optimism considerably. Pessimism might spread among the persons who do not succeed locally or to migrate in those sending regions or countries. Migration is a selection process of multiple forms. The western view of in-migration has for most parts focused on labour market related preferences. Skill shortages urge us to accept the “being somehow different” more easily. Learning to cope with this is called “intercultural competence”. In Berlin this is accessible through learning-by-doing or going to cultural events. Even there, 2 further steps are needed:
First step ahead, have more diversity everywhere, including so-called high art or centers of excellence (video xeno video22). Second step, consider it strange, if diversity is not the standard or part of day-to-day or normal life.
The performance of Mozart’s opera “Mitridate” at the Deutsche Staatsoper with performers and creators (booklet!) from all continents might be a good start to nourish xenophilia instead of xenophobia.
W for War
In Europe many people were lucky to live without the existential threat of war for a long time now. Putin has stopped this with his land-grabbing in Ukraine. We wonder why, what, when and where? War is back in our minds again. Members of the birth cohorts of the 1920s, 30s or early 40s have direct experience our traumatic memories related to war times. Some later born cohorts suffered from various forms of deprivation . Economic reconstruction or even so-called miracles may follow and can soften the traumatic experience, often by way of focusing attention on repair and new investments.
The work by James Hillman “A terrible love of war” has been a difficult read. To acknowledge that “war is normal” and our mindsets should take this into account, is hard to accept. Hillman cites Susan Sontag to state that “we cannot imagine how terrible war is – and how normal war can become”. We need a leap of imagination (p. 9) to grasp the mythical element about war which seems to be beyond the rational understanding of it. Greek tragedies told us, all along for more than 2000 years. The Romans exceled in it and German perfectionism and cold-bloodedness added the most horrible recent experience of war for millions of people. Memory and historical knowledge are important to activate recall for older and learning for younger generations. (short Video clip on war and UKR)
V for Value
Value in its singular form refers for most people to the value of things. Since Karl Marx we have been fighting about the surplus value of a worker’s work. Nowadays, we have to deal with speculation bubbles on the value of property or even basic elements of nutrition (Water, wheat, energy). Max Weber introduced us to the rigorous analysis of value judgements. In political science the plural “values” refers to basic human rights as fundamental values of humanity. Many other associations with the letter V pop up and arouse emotions: victory, video, view(s), vision, visit, voice, vote, vulnerability.
Creating lasting value seems to transform itself into part of our system of values later on. The longitudinal dimension of value is often neglected, particularly in the short-term focus of much of economic reasoning. Value over time, in addition to the distribution question, or as part of distribution over time, excites researchers of inequality and policy design for generations. Approaching the end of the alphabet increases the stakes of the “endgame”, it seems. Value for me, might not be of value for others. I hope you have found a person that values much of the same as you do yourself.
Interpersonal value, value exchange and intertemporal value are own fields of research. Since the Scottish enlightenment and Adam Smith’s work on “The theory of moral sentiments (TMS)”, reciprocity in value exchange has been an issue, well before the utilitarian turn in his own writings on “The wealth of nations”. Even Adam Smith refers to happiness and interest as a kind of value and “very laudable principles of actions” (part VII.ii.3.15 in TMS).
Children learn and experience value as natural part of growing up. Material things which you valued highly as toddler, you are ready to trash or exchange a couple of years later at much lower prices. Above which monetary value are you ready to trade in your humanitarian values? Never? History and bargaining theory is full of experiments and experiences that teach us otherwise. Corruption is the prominent example of exchanging or trading material value against immaterial values. Reading Kwame Anthony Appiah on “Experiments in ethics” is highly instructive. This bring me back to the economist joke I used to tell in lectures: You know that you’re an economist, if you ask your child, whether s/he prefers 20 Euros in cash, a trip to an adventure park later, a basket ball set or a pizza party for the next birthday. Economists do all this to find out about the value of each item, the preferences, the time frame of delayed reward or discounting of value also called the net-present value. Reading up to here is equal to the value of, maybe, an online bachelor in economics or social science. In your very own life review of learnings you then can estimate the value of your readings to you, your community or humanity. Alternatively, enjoy the joy of just living in peace with optimism. 
U for Union
Union, understanding, undo, unknown, uncertainty, universe, urbanization, use, u-turn. All those u-words spark imagination. Additionally, the short forms of u as abbreviation for you, ur = your, youth and smartphone typing are creating for us abbreviations to communicate even faster and shorter via social media. Union is my favourite of this list for several reasons: (1) Marital union, passionate topic not only for family sociologists, (2) trade unions, as collective form to organize solidarity in and across societies, (3) European Union, the formidable tool to create, conserve and ensure peaceful developments in Europe. We have to prolong this list with the union jack, the united states, the united nations and …, please continue the list.
For me, in union I see a whole film running, a process proceeding, or persons uniting. Unionization, just like two persons deciding to pass more time together, has some magic in it. Match making is the modern term for it. No Union without reunion, dissolving a union might be part of the process as well, as painful it can turn out to be. Most of the times we grow throughout the process. Forming a union, in all senses of the word and of all sorts of forms, is a kind of teleological urge of us as a species. We share this with many animals but have also developed strategies and weapons to force others into union. Unfortunately, no u-word without its potential to be used in the sense of abuse. Unite to defend the union of fans of unions. (Evolution of Union of Tweets own Video 12-2022). IMG_4611
Digital Technology
Im Februar 2018 hatte ich auf dieser Webseite eine kleine Veröffentlichung mit dem kurzen folgenden Text angekündigt.
“A new research paper dealing with digital technologies is now published in the Open Journal of Social Sciences. The major impetus of the small scale project was to identify the potential of digital technologies to foster democratic procedures and decision-making. The paper investigates the role of new technologies to support employees and the trade union movement.”
The pdf-download free of charge is here.
Fast 5 Jahre später bräuchte das Paper eine Ergänzung, denn es gibt wohl eine interessierte Community dafür (1000+ Downloads, 3500+ online views-reads). Insbesondere sind neben die sozialen Netzwerke diverse mediale Platformen dazu gekommen, wie TiKTok, Mastodon, Twitch, Instagram und fast schon wieder vorbei Twitter. Ergänzen würde ich wohl auch die Notwendigkeit, digitale Technologie einzusetzen in der Bekämpfung von Korruption. So ließe sich automatisch in einer großen Menge an Zahlungen Auffälligkeiten wie hohe Bargeldsummen leicht identifizieren und Alarmsignale senden. Ebenso (Gruppen-) Reiseaktivitäten und zweifelhafte Abrechnungen könnten leichter zu Aufmerksamkeit führen.
Eigentlich freue ich mich bereits, dass dieser Artikel in eine damals recht unbekannten, aber eben “open access publication” doch eine so große Reichweite von aktiv Suchenden und Lesenden gefunden hat. Gut, gleich im Internet zu veröffentlichen und nicht in einem überteuerten Sammelband oder wissenschaftlicher Fachzeitschrift mit Bezahlschranke versteckt zu bleiben. 
S for Society
At least since the “Greek Polis” became a subject of science, the study of society has filled libraries around the world. To catch up with the social sciences view on society, we may start with foundations based on Max Weber, Niklas Luhmann, Jürgen Habermas, Ulrich Beck to then move on to my predilection with micro-level foundation of social theory based on work from James Coleman. The history of sociological ideas runs from the protestant work ethic, autopoiesis in systems theory, ethics of discourse and communicative action, risk management to “1 to 1 relationships” as pillars of theorising about society. 10.000 pages later on, you might still ask yourself the question: what practical knowledge have I gained from this. Well let’s see. Imagine you want to learn about a friend and whether s/he is really a friend. Nowadays we would start with an online-search to find profiles of a person (facebook, Instagram, linked-in, twitter, twitch, mastodon). When the first entries pop-up, we start to learn about interests, looks, friends and preferences of the person. In which social media the person is (or not) participating tells a lot. We start to build an image of the person and her/his networks and communities. Soon we start comparing the person’s world reference framework with our set of values and characteristics. Welcome to thinking about society in small, and interactions within society or between groups of society. Adding some solid knowledge about statistics and you’re ready to start the science of society.
Yet, so many still open questions. When talking about society, we have to think about the trend of individualisation and ways to keep society together despite increasing plurality of life courses. “Solitude versus loneliness” is as much a social as it is an individual based issue. Community-building with inclusion, staying-on and exclusion processes have to be studied in detail. The whole process of civilisation or the study of suicide has been a sociological topic since its inception by Emile Durkheim. Imagineering is an additional tool to speculate in a systematic way about the past and future of society. That’s where all the arts come into the picture as well. The history of art is full of perspectives on society, its splendour, the misery of individuals, communities and societies. An emotional starting point is a very valid starting point, the science of society then moves on to abstraction and generalisations as well. The challenge is, to capture audiences emotionally, with short reflections on society. 
R for Repairing
Without noticing for many people, we have shifted into the repair mode. Our planet needs repair work. Well beyond the less plastic, CO2, less oil, gaz and pollution in general, we have to actively repair what we have damaged, certainly since the industrial revolution. With nuclear waste we have entered into a phase, in which repairing is not really feasible. Areas around Tschernobyl and Fukushima speak for themselves. However, we seem to leave the repairing to future generations. Whereas for us currently it is an option, later on it will be an obligation.
The bionic interest has already turned to the Axolotl and Polycarpa mytiligera. Both species can repair themselves after the loss or a malfunctioning part of their body. Rather than producing externally, growing the spare part is a promising healing device. Nature provides many fabulous insights, if we were able to preserve the biodiversity. Repairing biodiversity is difficult, impossible for lost species which we do not even really know. Start to repair and build awareness that repairing can be fun. Beyond the gender stereotypes, women repair cars, men repair clothes, we have to learn from each other how to use our repair knowledge for many other things and devices. This applies even to our social, legal and economic systems.
In addition to reimagining, we need repairing everywhere. I have lots of stuff to repair at home. When do you start repairing? Welcome to the next trend: the joy to repair, repairs even joy. 
Q for Question
Quality and quantity or queer and query could have made valuable entries here as well. Common to all is the underlying process of questions. Questions put to oneself, to others, society or supra natural or supra national instances. Can quantity turn into quality? Is a queer perspective a new one? Is a query in a programming language the beginning of each algorithm? Questioning is a child’s “natural” approach to understanding the world. This does not stop soon after childhood, but it is occupying, if not haunting, us until the end of our life. When is this exactly happening – the end thing? Are we free to chose this? Just try to answer one of these questions and you’ll find out how one question leads to the next. We are all the same in this behaviour. However, we all find different stopping rules to the query algorithm. Religion is a fast shortcut to stop further questions. Sciences are the never, ever, ending type of questioning. Mathematics solved part of the problem. For a lot of series we are able to calculated the limit value towards which the series evolves circumventing the lack of a stopping rule. Fundamental human rights are such a far-reaching stopping rule. Just like after the French revolution, the question was, how to quickly spread the message of human rights. Didactic and paedagogics evolved in parallel. From “cogito ergo sum” to “rogatio ergo sum”. 
P for Policy
Politics and policy are key elements of democracy. Agreeing that we might strongly disagree, is a virtue of democracy, particularly in order to avoid a confrontation using force. Dialectic thinking builds on the confrontation of opposite opinions originating even of the same factual knowledge. Based on different theories the same evidence will be interpreted differently. Hence, in the field of politics, where disagreement is part and parcel of the game to build majorities, policies will change. This then leads to the belief that we need a policy in each and every subject of the alphabetical list we are about to create. There is a high risk, if you are not having a digital security policy, you will be at high risks that crucial infrastructure might not work in case of a major internal or external conflict. Candide in his small garden might run out of water to water the plants or climate change is threatening the species growing until recently. Young startups, just like ageing enterprises, persons or societies need a policy to take care of survival, not only of the fittest. As the challenges and stakes of humanity rise fast, a revival of the policy sciences is dearly needed before the pervasive skill shortages creap into the fields of social sciences as well. 
O for Optimism
Looking back at the end of every year to what happened in the last 12 months gives mixed feelings in annual repetition. Developments of nature and biodiversity are sometimes troublesome (variants of viruses like omicron). Despite wars and man-made disasters most people have a capacity to bolster with optimism. To view a glass as half-full rather than half-empty is a common description of two different perspectives on the same fact. Additionally from a longitudinal perspective it matters, whether you started from a full glass beforehand or from the empty glass. In experiments we would need to clarify the role of the starting point and evolution before the statement on the 50-50 state of affairs.
In the French enlightenment, represented by Voltaire‘s “Candide ou l’optimisme“, a critical view on the optimism of Leibniz is expressed. The optimistic claim of Leibniz, “we live in the best of possible worlds” is questioned by Candide who believes taking care of his own little garden is probably the best he can do to preserve nature and the world. These two apparently opposite perspectives and conclusions on the potential of human action we find reflected still nowadays in politics and world affairs. Do we stand up to defend human rights or do we believe the fight is futile? The optimism embedded in Ukranian culture, for example, demonstrates the power that might come out of optimism. It would even go as far as stating that optimism is a precondition for democracy, always striving for the improvement and spread of democratic procedures. Creating opportunities to more freedom to do something is the driving force besides ensuring to curb infringements on one’s freedom. Optimism is a close ally of imagination, imagination of all people living in peace. A nice sunset gives hope for a nice sunrise as well.
M for Memory
Besides the English term memory, which refers to a huge scientific literature starting with cognitive psychology, I like the French version of “mémoire”, because it is more comprehensive with additional meanings, nicely represented by Wikipedia.org. On the German Wikipedia-page you find first the reference to the children’s game memory, turning around images and memorising where the counterpart is/was (play pairs). This diversity hints towards a cultural element in memory. There is a person’s memory or mental capacity to recall and ways to remember. The latter term refers a lot more to collective memories and becomes a more debated issue. Danny Trom uses the term “split memory” in a chapter on France and the “myths of nations” (p.129-151). In David Brook’s reader on “the social animal” he states that grandmasters in chess (p.88) were long believed to have superior memory. This is actually not true as memory experiments showed, but they rather saw formations and “internal connections forming networked chunks of information”.
“Mémoire”, on the contrary, refers also to the writing of a person’s own biography. Nowadays, book shops contain whole sections of autobiographies, the most sold appears to be the one by Michele Obama recently, if I recall correctly. Among the most scandalous is the publication of the “Journal pour Anne (Pingeot) 1964-1970” by Francois Mitterand. All the autobiographical documents make explicit major parts of what might form collective memory later on.
Memory has found its way into engineering and computing. The memory effect in batteries or being “out of memory” frightens users in computing or programming. In short, I wish you the best of memories reading this page and stimulation by visiting memorials (image: Jewish Museum in Berlin 2022, Ullmann exhibition). 
L for Law
Contrary to a popular misunderstanding. Law is not boring. The history of ideas is full of exiting projects based on laws. Starting with the foundation of empiricism, i.e. the comparison of laws governing the different Greek city states pioneered by Aristotle. Considering law from the perspective of legislation gives it an actionable touch and makes it more exciting to many persons. Contrary to a static perception of law, laws can be changed and are subject to interpretation continuously by courts and judges. The fascination with law might start with the philosophers of the French enlightenment like Montesquieu. “De l’esprit des lois” – explains already the need to look behind the literal text of law. What is the spirit of law, becomes the driving question. Not only the categories of countries like republic, monarchy and despotism were argued by him, but also the separation of powers into an executive, legislative and judicial power is his original contribution. These principles govern the German “Grundgesetz” and are a common understanding of the founding states of the European Union as well as a potential breaking point.
A sociological perspective on law is formulated by Niklas Luhmann (short intro in D) and highlights the danger of laws as a self-referential system. This dominated by experts who develop the system further independent of the concerns and understandings of wider society. In order to understand this concern, it is probably useful to think of climate change as an urgent problem. Bio-diversity has for much too long not been of much relevance for legal founding principles of our constitutions. In the same vein, women judges or diversity in the legal profession is a point of concern. Majorities versus minority rights create intrinsic tensions in law, legislation, execution and interpretation. Analysing the half-life of laws is interesting, i.e. how fast do they really change or get abandoned altogether. Equality in front of the law remains a thorny issue. It is a huge issue when moving from law to justice as primary concern. The most interesting point is the view of law as a changing matter, hopefully for the better, but this is another question altogether. Reveillons-nous l’esprit des lois ! (pas seulement au Reveillon). 
K for Knowledge
Readers of the sociology and/or the philosophy of science or knowledge have a hard time. Each discipline is evolving at such a high speed that is terribly hard for humans to follow more than 1 or 2 fields. Perhaps the choice of Karma instead of knowledge would have made it easier here. Alternatively, in German it is easy to find many nouns starting with a capital K. Kapital, Krieg, Kritik or Käsekuchen would have been popular, I guess. Soon I shall open the comments for suggestions for additional nouns, as part of the empirical “swarm knowledge strategy” rather than the theory-driven deductive method applied in knowledge generation on my side so far.
But wait, we are already in the middle of the unsatiable quest for knowledge. On a meta-level we would deal with the multiple ways to acquire knowledge and create new knowledge. Artifical intelligence is certainly one of the hypes at the moment. New data and new combinations of data drive us forward in the expanding universe and knowledge space. We have witnessed the disappearance of the thick printed encyclopedia in most households, replaced by specilised digital dictionaries or the network society’s shared knowledge base of “wikipedia“. Knowledge is linked to the history of ideas and Peter Burke is a prominent figure to rely on as a reference in this field. 20 years after “A social history of knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot” he published the much acclaimed: “The Polymath. A cultural history from Leonardo da Vinci to Susan Sontag” in 2020. To synthesise across the many “monsters of knowledge” over centuries is a daunting task. I like quotes like the one from Leibniz (p.77) “the horrible heap of books that is constantly increasing” and then his own continuation: “Printing, once viewed as a solution to the problem, had become a problem itself”. The whole section is devoted to information overload. Fragmentation of knowledge into disciplines and, much worse, the manufacturing of false knowledge create new challenges to knowledge. Maybe transforming the term to “knowledges” rather than knowledge is likely to capture better the differences between artificial knowledge, created by artificial intelligence and specialised algorithms, and human based knowledge. In knowledge storage we have lost the race with computers, but in deciding what are promising combinations between different fields of knowledge, we are still a wee bit ahead of the machines. Klara tell me, where is the exit, or your synthesis of the whole lot. Meanwhile I continue to read – what? books and the like. 
I for Imagination
We are all full of imagination. The human brain hardly can do without it. It could be understood as if thinking of oneself is a continuous process of imagining and reimagining oneself. We just developed or were forced to suppress imagination at various instances throughout our lives. Day dreams are rarely tolerated, starting at school, then on the job and probably for a long time also about the way we imagine our own ending or life after death. Just trying not to think, like in meditation, seems to be a very hard exercise and it demands long practice to arrive at longer durations. Abstraction is one of the ways of art to allow imagination to rule the process of creation. In view of the anniversary of Pablo Picasso in 2023, the Brussels Royal museum of fine arts
is presenting a paedagogic reflection and demonstration how Picasso emerged on his way towards abstraction as his preferred way of imagination and reimagination as part of the realisation process of his art work. As part of the Cubist revolution Picasso is quoted in this exhibition on how he paints: “Je ne peins pas ce que je vois, je peins ce que je pense.” and “Chez moi, un tableau est une somme de destructions.” Nice imagination, reimagination and de-construction I would say. Like the imagination depicted above from Paul Klee reflects the accomplishment of a new form of pictural language. Try imagination, it isn’t hard to do, “John Lennon” sang once. In Brussels you can try seeing the cubist way in the Picasso exhibition, a good way to prepare yourself for the next visits of fabulous exhibitions in honor of Picasso in 2023. 
H for Health
Health is not just a personal issue. Of course, in modern times most people are primarily concerned with their very own health. Particularly, if pain is involved, we tend to put ourselves first. Only various religions and ideologies put God or some other bigger thing, for example identity, in front of personal pain. This bigger thing is believed to decide wars, like Russia trying to anihilate Ukraine. Russia’s military agression stands against the fight for freedom, democracy and perpetuates corruption.
At the beginning of the Corona-Crisis most persons and societies still believed health and infections are only a very personal issue. Researchers with knowledge about “public health” knew already, viruses have accompanied humanity since its beginnings and maybe continue to do so even beyond our disappearance. Hence, addressing the topic of society and health from a public health perspective has become much more popular as prevention is key to fight pandemics as early as possible. However, for prevention to work you have to involve and rely on individual behaviour. As soon as we leave the personal issue of health, we have to address a whole set of other topics like patient – carer relationships, cooperation, interdisciplinarity, public expenditure, public-private partnerships, corruption or behaviour of large crowds. We have developed antidotes against most difficulties, probably the strongest one is solidarity. Social systems that address inequality of provision (e.g. between regions) or inequality in access to and quality of medical services (e.g. doctors, care or pharmaceuticals) have a strong role to play. Structural, financial and political issues play a powerful role in health. As we think more about prevention and costs we start to understand that we have to start with nutrition, mobility, mortality and our western style of life in more general terms, particularly if we think about health on a global scale. There is no planet B where we could travel to, once it has become impossible to lead a healthy life on our planet. Topics of health over the life course or ageing will need a lot more attention. Findings on the risk of suicide after onset of physical health problems (Link to study) asks for fast responses. Access to digital tools might be part of the solution like “Sympatient” as well as being part of the problem like data leakage. 
G for God
God is dead, wrote Nietzsche about 140 years ago. So, is he, is she, are they? The discussion is ongoing. As science has debunked the myths surrounding birth, the jury is out as humanity is claiming freedom of choice also towards the end of life. Our cathedrals of Modernity, i.e. libraries , or Tempel of knowledge, i.e. universities, offer lots of instruction and Musea artefacts or Anschauungsmaterial to answer these existential questions. Perhaps this is just a lot of noise about “rien”, “nichts” or “Much ado about nothing“.
We might have to rethink society from scratch, starting with the definition of social backround and identity , but there are plenty of good sources to build upon, starting with basic human rights and the Schuman declaration for the construction of Europe, rising out of the ashes. Lots of hard thinking to do, Rodin thought so, too. The thinker above the “porte de l’enfer” ready for meditation in the Musée Rodin Paris 7eme arrondisement. 
F for Freedom
This choice is no surprise, or is it? Who is longing the most for freedom? People in the so-called Western world are reported to score highest in the rankings of achieved levels of freedom. However, the longing for freedom often seems the strongest in countries, or regions within a country, where elements of freedom are restricted. Then fighting for freedom becomes an intense struggle, sometimes leading to outright war or fighting back like in Ukraine. Beyond the negative freedom (free from capital punishment) there is the positive freedom to express yourself freely. Both perspectives on freedom are crucial. Being free from prosecution is often only a first step towards the goal of being free to live your way of life as you feel it. It has always been a political struggle and will remain one today as well as in future. Less consensus reigns on the topic to what extent economic freedom is a constituent part of the term freedom. Far-reaching economic inequality within societies frequently limit persons at the bottom of the distribution to fully participate in society and excercise many components of freedom like decent food, housing, health and health care. All this remains the biggest challenge for humanity for years to come. We shall need a lot more heros in the name of freedom like the famous Nobel prize winners. Fighting for freedom in a peaceful way is probably the biggest challenge for humanity also in the 21 century. 
D for Democracy
Stand up for Democracy. Give me a D. Yes, we are passionate for democracy. Even if we are not singing Beethoven‘s “Ode an die Freude” every day, we are well aware that we have to defend democracy at numerous places. The essay in the New Yorker by Jill Lepore from January 2020 on the manifold risks to democracy and the way forward is a great inspiration. Democracy is always a “work in progress”. It improves and in most cases rises with the challenges. However, this demands to stay alert and wither the beginnings of threats to its functioning. Beyond the external threats, internal threats to democratic values are abound. The discursive element that is highlighted in the essay remains crucial. Debating in public is key. Transparency of arguments, reasoning and values are constituent parts of democracy. Clandestine ways of corruption, bribery and threatening of violence become apparent when fractions of society retreat from the public to form insider groups. Defenders of democracy need to speak out in public, publish they work, expose and perform their arts, challenge school curricula and be active in any policy field. This is a lot to do, but we have to prevail and rise to the continuous challenges to the democratic way of life. Too many dictators and autocrats around the world would like to see democracy fail. Worse, they work actively, like in “Qatargate” in November 2022 in Brussels to spread illicit practices of corruption. We have to strengthen our “antennas” and sensors to detect such practices. Prevention is key. Tough reactions with the force of the legal system to stop the spreading is also indicated. Let’s rise to the challenge, again and again with the latest technology. 
C for Corruption
After the association of C with crises of corona, climate, consumption and the church we have to come back to one of the original links: corruption. Beyond the work of describing and analysing corruption from the time of the Roman empire to the Americas of today (Link) by Thomas Strunck, the re-reading of Niccoló Machiavelli is recommended by a number of scholars (in latin here). Also, in Asia the work and writings of Niccoló have been rediscovered (Link). “non creando in veritá le cuose nove”. It needs “una ferma experienza”. As people don’t just believe in the truth of new reasons, a firm experience of them is needed. New princes cannot just pray, they have to install a new vision or belief with force (p.25) by literally forcing persons (forzare) or “fare … credere par forza” stated in Chapter 6 of THE PRINCE. If we just complement the term force by force of persuasion, or money as surrogate for both, the writing of Niccoló speaks directly to corruption in our times. History does not repeat itself. However, the history of ideas still teaches “some dogs old tricks” until they are found out by investigative journalism and an independent judiciary, which both did not exit at Niccoló’s time. (inspired by Chaudhuri, S. & Chakravarty, P. (2022) Machiavelli Then and Now: History, Politics, Literature. Cambridge University Press.) 
Human Rights
It is 10 years after the publication of a Ph.D. thesis on “Corruption: a violation of human rights and a crime under international law?” by Martine Boersma that at the top level of the European Parliament and the International Trade Union Congress the smell of corruption is investigated by police and judges. Following “Qatargate” (Radio France Link) this means that the persons accused of corruption, forming a criminal group and money laundering have changed their lobbying in return for accepting cash. Exploitation of workers and more than 100 deaths in Qatar was the result, due to the heat when building the stadiums for the Football World Cup which took place in 2022. Following the recommendations of Boersma corruption in this respect can be interpreted as these persons contributing to and being guilty of abusing their political positions to silence criticism and whistle-blowers, and the right for defendants to a fair trial for example. The advocacy to counter corruption with developing international human rights legislation and persecution in this respect is dearly needed now. “This line of reasoning transforms a corrupt act into a possible starting point for legal action, be it at the national level, …, or at the international level by submitting a complaint to a regional or global human rights monitoring body.” (Boersma, 2012 p.376) The International Criminal Court or “alternative such as the establishment of a permanent anti-corruption court, or anti-corruption commission to monitor compliance with the UN Convention Against Corruption should be kept in mind, as well as the possibility of setting up ad hoc anti-corruption tribunals” (p.380). Not much to add to this, act now, before the practice spreads.
Francesco Merloni wrote in his book (2019, p.132) on corruption with Italy in comparative perspective: “when corruption is defined in its wider meaning of maladministration, we are looking at a mass phenomenon which is “sub-criminal”, yet nonetheless with strongly negative implications for the efficiency and effectiveness of public administration and democracy in general.” The practice of excessive salaries of the Italian parliament (p.131) is mentioned in the list of case histories of corruption just like the international event of the EXPO 2015 in Milano with huge construction projects (LeMonde on Panzeri l’ex-eurodéputé). Learning from case studies is best practice in many business schools and probably beyond. Finally, attention should be drawn to prevention of corruption. Here the reading of Corruption and Anti-corruption by Larmour and Wolanin (2001, p.235) offers good advice. The micro-economics of corruption (pp. 119) states for example that “If expected penalties are sufficiently high, bribery is deterred” (p.126). Equally the real threat of a full and explicit audit of operations, promotions and financial transactions might deter corrupt activities. Most importantly the authors state, “the social networks approach to corruption allows the corruption investigator to conceptualise the operation of corrupt networks in terms of power flows and relationships rather than the attributes of actors. The question to be asked by the corruption investigator is not whether actor A is corrupt. The question should be, what is the relationship between actor A and other potentially corrupt actors in the network.” Re-reading some classics of sociology like Max Weber on bureaucracy, but also James Coleman’s foundation of social theory provide basics for understanding social interaction when things go fundamentally in the wrong direction. We might even need to use artificial intelligence to detect corruptive practices to shield and support the trade union movement. 
State of the Union
“The times they are a changing”. Currently, we witness that democracies are at multiple risks. One existential threat is, of course, war of external origin. Democracies have been perceived as often to slow to mobilize military forces sufficient to resist “Blitzkrieg”. What Nazi-Germany applied successful at the beginning took a long time and millions of dead persons to rectify. Similarly, the threat to Ukraine’s independence and liberal aspirations are threatened by Russian imperialism. The other existential threat is that of “the enemy within”. This is the conclusion by Canova (2011, p.213) when he writes on “democracy’s disappearing duties”. Whereas he has primarily in mind, that citizens need to participate more actively in the duties to democracy’s survival. These are “the duty to become informed and to vote, as well as rights and duties related to civic and/or military duties. The discussion, whether we need an army of the many or an army of specialists has shifted largely in favour of the need for specialists, simply think of cyber or drone war technology. However, the threat of the enemies from within becomes clear if we remember terrorist attacks targeted at democracies practice of free movement, free speech or art. Another centuries-old threat has come to our attention again. Corruption. The slow-motion erosion of democracies is hard to fight against as it operates not with visible tanks and weapons, but with clandestine and psychological ways of slow corrosion of organisations and institutions. Combatting corruption is even more tricky in cross-country settings like the European Union. Reference to cultural practices and exclusive or inner circles as cultural exceptionalism make it hard to introduce non-discriminatory monitoring and controlling mechanisms in democracies. Only a well-equipped security, police and judicial system can stem the risk to democracies from corruption and organized crime. It is not only a matter of state responsibility, but our democracies rely on an alert public to stand up continually for our basic values. Just singing the national and European anthem is not enough, fighting corruption is laboursome and cumbersome, particularly as corrupt circles do not refrain from using brute force and weapons (Reichsbürger, Mafia, etc.). Addressing inner and outer enemies at the same time remains high on the agenda for the surviving and thriving of democracies. The foundation ideas of the European Union were constructed by Monnet and Schuman on a sustainable democracy. Let’s not endanger this through a sluggish response on corruption.
inspired by Canova, T.A. 2011: Democracy’s disappearing duties. In: Democratic Citizenship and War. Peled, V. et al. (eds.) pp. 199-216.
Corruption
There is an extensive literature on corruption in the social sciences. However, the evil practice continues to ruin personal lifes, institutions and countries. Psychologists put corrupt persons in the psychopath life trajectory (Link) or explain corruption as result of the triad of personality traits for persons scoring high on not only psychopathy, but also on narcissism as well as Machiavellianism (Link). Some important lessons derive from a fast reading of the scientific literature. (1) Corruption develops over a period of time. The creed for ever more power seems a strong driving force. (2) Some personality traits are more likely to deteriorate into corruptive behavior and (3) institutions need to monitor carefully leadership practices and guard against abuses of power already at small instances like threatening with violence or dismissal. (4) Countries can do a lot to limit corruption through adequate legal systems, most notably through a truely independent judiciary as well as the need of investigative journalism to accompany potentially illicit behavior. All this comes at a cost, but without it democracies are at high risk. The European Union has to strengthen its defences in this respect to remain a credible institution, just as much as a great number of Member States. Not only the World Bank or OECD need to be monitoring countries, but we all need to be better equiped to read the early signs of corruption. Whistle blowing and the protection of these persons is part of an effective anti-corruption system. Early signs of “nepotism” and “favoring of friends” in the workplace are easy to identify, but taking measures against it, needs firm committment on the part of advisory boards, colleagues at work or other interested parties like stakeholders or investors in case of private firms (wirecard) . (Link to NZZ). 
Berlin Kulturforum
Am 4.11.22 war mal wieder Museumssonntag. In großer Zahl strömten die Besuchenden in die Berliner Museen. Da war ich auch dabei. Rechtzeitig Zeitfenster zu buchen, war die Devise. Selbst das war mir gelungen. So habe ich mir einen musealen Overkill – “plein dans les yeux” geschaffen, der einen fantastischen kulturhistorischen Gesamteindruck vermittelt hat. Für mich beginnt die architektonische Zeitreise mit dem Bau von James Sterling und seiner “rosa, himmelblauen Denkfabrik” mit seinem einmaligen Grundriss. 
Dort lässt sich nicht nur im Campanile träumen (C Beispiel hier). Im Video gleich am Anfang zu sehen ist das WZB. Dann geht es über die Gemäldegalerie und dem Kupferstichkabinett zur Matthäuskirche samt Glockenschlag. Die Phiharmonie ist der gold-gelb strahlende Diamant der Schmuckreihe, sicherlich auch wegen der “ansteigenden Weinberge” (Zitat von Architekt Hans Scharoun) darin. Farblich sticht das Zeltdach des windigen Sony Centers hervor. Der Bahntower am Potsdamer Platz hat schon mal das Licht ausgeschaltet, damit die Züge noch rollen. Das Keuzfahrtschiff oder der Containerkoloss des gebürtigen Bremerhavener Scharoun (Staatsbibliothek) ist jetzt sonntags geöffnet und leuchtet in bescheidener Sachlichkeit. Die NNG – Neue Nationalgalerie lässt durch die Beleuchtung und transparente Architektur auf die laufende Ausstellung von “Bonvicini” blicken. Dazugehörig ist die Klanginstallation, die im Hintergrund zu hören ist, auf der äußeren Wandelhalle, die früher schon zu Choreografien inspirierte. 
Ach richtig, es fehlt noch etwas. Bei Tageslicht ist der Traum vorbei, da wird an dem nächsten Megaprojekt gebaut, “der Scheune“. Naja, den Grundriss kennen wir ja alle. Das Berliner Psychogramm am Ende des Videos zu sehen, heisst: “I must have a wall behind me”. Ich muss eine Wand/Mauer hinter mir haben. Aber so richtig los kommen von den Mauern, können wir hier nicht, oder?
Marx-Wagner
Begleitend zu den Ausstellungen zu Karl Marx und Richard Wagner fand eine vom DHM organisierte Vortragsreihe statt. Die Links (hier) zu den Hördokus sind eine anregende Erweiterung der Ausstellung und stützen die These der Verbindung zwischen Karl Marx und Richard Wagner auf einer abstrahierenden Meta-Ebene. Die Vorträge, Gespräche und Diskussionen informieren und vertreten wissenschaftlich fundierte Thesen. Die müssen gerade nicht von allen geteilt werden, aber eine Haltung zu dem Thema haben die meisten Menschen in der Welt, besonders wenn wir an die Millarden von Menschen jenseits von der westlichen Welt denken. Es ist also auch an uns, diese Diskussion über den Kapitalismus zu führen. Hören wir mal rein. Alle dauern 1h-1.30h!
Einleitung, M&W Kosky + Bisky, M&W Nietzsche, M&W Mahatma Gandhi, M&W Viktoria Kaiserin Friedrich, Ein Artikel aus der Financial Times von Martin Sandbu vom 18.8.2021 und Martin Wolf vom 21.11.2021 ergänzen die Diskussion: Wenn der Kapitalismus weltweit gewonnen hat, was war dann noch mal der Wettbewerb? Bitte öffnen Sie jetzt ihren Computer, Sie haben 3 Stunden Zeit für die Beantwortung. $???$ Danach speichern Sie bitte das Dokument in der Cloud und nehmen es zur Evaluation nach 10,20,30,40 Jahren wieder hervor. Hat sich ihre Meinung über den Sachverhalt zwischenzeitlich verändert? THX for your feedback. 
Wagner Kontrovers
Selbst im 21.-ten Jahrhundert lesen wir weiter von Kontroversen um Richard Wagner (z.B Molnar und Molnar 2022 S.161-186). Dazu hat auch das DHM beigetragen mit einer Ausstellung, die interessante Assessoires aus dem Leben Wagners kürzlich in die Vitrinen stellte (s.u.). Neben Dokumenten zu seinem hartnäckigen Antisemitismus, bereicherten die extravaganten Kleidungsstücke, Maßanfertigungen, Beispieldrucke zu seinen politischen Überzeugungen und Dokumente zur kontinuierlichen Geldnot, die Sichtweise auf das musikalische Schaffen des Komponisten. Verliebtheit in kostspielige Details bei gleichzeitigen Überredungskünsten bei Stiftenden und Gönnern, haben sein überragendes Lebenswerk erst möglich gemacht. Die Zusammenschau von Leben der Person und seinem Werk konnte zeitgleich zur Ausstellung über Karl Marx in Nachbarräumen des DHM in 2022 besucht werden. Die überraschende, aber gelungene, Parallele oder Klammer für beide Ausstellungen ist die von beiden auf völlig unterschiedliche Weise betriebene Kapitalismuskritik, wie ein Begleittext und in Führungen durch die Ausstellungen berichtet wurde. Müssen wir zur Freistellung des Schaffens von Wagner dem Vorschlag Adornos folgen, die Musik des Komponisten frei zu machen von seinem Antisemitismus und der späteren Vereinnahmung durch die Nazis? Es fällt mir äußerst schwer, diese Trennung vorzunehmen. Es ist jedoch Wagners eigenen Schriften zu schulden, dass er einen Absolutismus predigte und darauf hinarbeitete. Das Werk „Muette de Portici“ von Auber, welchem er sogar die Revolution in Belgien zuschrieb (Colas 2012 S.26) hatte ihn schwer beeindruckt. In einem Aufsatz „Über deutsches Musikwesen 1840 S.165, schreibt Wagner, zitiert nach Colas, „La Muette entspricht einem Nationalwerke, wie jede Nation höchstens nur eines auszuweisen hat“. Die kurze Zeit Wagners in Paris ab 1839-1842 hat ihn mehr beeinflusst als er zugeben mochte, vielleicht durch Ablehnung in Frankreich sogar in eine dialektische Entwicklungsrichtung hineinbewegt. Die libertäre und kritische Einstellung Wagners zu politischen und wirtschaftlichen Zuständen seiner Zeit, bei gleichzeitigem Ausleben eines extravaganten Lebensstils, lässt den Tonkünstler in zwiespältigem Licht erscheinen. Dieses Facettenreichtum der Persönlichkeit und des Werks kam in der Ausstellung im DHM gut zur Geltung. Ambivalenz aushalten, lehrte diese Ausstellung. Anregen zu weiterer Befassung mit Person, Werk und Wirkung ist die Folge. Bei mir hat das gewirkt. Die in dieser Zeit sich vertiefenden “Mythen der Nationen” (Flacke M. DHM 1998) in europäischen Ländern, spiegeln den Wettstreit der Komponisten um nationale und überregionale Geltung wider. Ein anderer Komponist dieser Zeit, der als Vermittler zwischen den Kulturen wirken wollte, ist dabei etwas in Vergessenheit geraten, sowie viele andere KomponistInnen dieser Zeit, die sich an dem anzettelten deutsch-französischen Kulturkampf nicht beteiligen wollten. Der Tod von Wagner am 13.2.1883 ist 3 Wochen nach Friedrich von Flotow, 1 Monat vor Karl Marx. In dem Jahr veröffentlicht Nietzsche “Also sprach Zarathustra 1.Band”. Bewegte Zeiten.
Kapitalismus Kritik
Das Deutsche Historische Museum in Berlin (DHM) zeigte vom 10.2 bis 21.8.22 die Ausstellung “Karl Marx und der Kapitalismus“. Die Verbindung von Leben, Werk und Wirkung des in Trier geborenen Sozialwissenschaftlers Karl Marx st eindrucksvoll. In einer knapp gehaltenen Dokumenten- und Exponatensammlung wird die Bedeutung von Marx für die Weltgeschichte durch seine Kapitalismuskritik deutlich. Viele schreckliche Taten wurden in seinem Namen ausgeübt. Dabei geht oft die wissenschaftliche Analyse, die von ihm betrieben wurde unter. Gerade in seinem Verständnis von wirtschaftlichen Krisen hat er Beiträge geleistet, die uns in der Bankenkrise 2007 nochmals klar geworden sind. Weiterhin sind die Arbeiten zur Ungleichheit zwischen Kapitaleignern und Beschäftigten eine grundlegende Herangehensweise geblieben, die von SozialwissenschaftlerInnen auch im 21.-ten Jahrhundert, beispielsweise von Piketty fortgesetzt und mit aktuellen Daten nahezu weltweit untermauert werden. Die Folgen der industriellen Revolution, die er damals erforschte, befasst uns heute wieder in anderer Form zum Beispiel mit den Auswirkungen der Digitalisierung auf Beschäftigung und Lohngefüge. Selbst den von ihm geprägten Begriff der Ausbeutung, verwenden wir weniger auf Beschäftigung, als auf die Ausbeutung der Natur oder unserer Umwelt zugunsten von einseitiger Kapitalvermehrung. Kurz gesagt: Karl hat keinen Murx gemacht, sondern Methoden und Analysen geliefert, die noch die heutigen Jugendlichen und nächsten Generationen beschäftigen werden. Damit wird das DHM einem Postulat gerecht, das bereits bei der Eröffnung des Historischen Museums Frankfurt von Hilmar Hoffmann formuliert wurde: “Ein demokratisches historisches Museum ist kein Museum, das Kriegschroniken in goldenen Lettern schreibt oder die Mächtigen zu Übermenschen stilisiert. Es informiert vielmehr über die Geschichte des Volkes, über die Sozialgeschichte der Durchschnittsmenschen”. (S.33 in DHM Ideen-Kontroversen-Perspektiven 1988). Zu all diesem hat die Ausstellung “Karl Marx und der Kapitalismus” unzweifelhaft einen guten Beitrag geleistet. Was bleibt? x-tausend BesucherInnen und ein dicker Katalog. Reicht das? Wirkungsforschung zu Ausstellungen könnte hilfreich sein. 
Merkel
Angela Merkel gehört nun endgültig zur Geschichte. Zuerst die Ausstellung von Merkel-Porträts von 1919-2021 der Fotografin Herlinde Koelbl im DHM mit Katalog erschienen bei Taschen, kürzlich das Interview des Spiegelredakteurs und die Quintessenz daraus in LeMonde vom 29.11.22, zusammengenommen eine kleine Bilanz der Amtszeiten. Die Porträts (1) in Draufsicht 2/3 des Bildes durch das Gesicht ausgefüllt und (2) stehend mit Händen zur Raute geformt, zeigen das Altern durch die Last der Ämter. Ist die Raute anfangs noch mit Druck und weit abgesreizten Fingern zu sehen, wird die Geste im Laufe der Amtszeit lust- und kraftlos. Der Gestaltungswille noch als Umweltministerin hat sich durch Getrieben-sein später abgenutzt. Das Bild 13 der Pressemappe zeigt die Kanzlerin 2020 mit Maske und nur noch 2 Fingern jeder Hand, die sich berühren. Aus der Versuch der Quadratur des Kreises in Amts-, Partei- und Koalitionsgeschäften. Auch das Bild auf S. 243 des Katalogs von 2021 spiegelt eher eine gequälte Kanzerlin statt eine streitbare Verfechterin ihres Amtes wider. In Rückschau erscheint es wohl doch zu lange gewesen sein für den Menschen Merkel. Der Verweis auf das freiwille Ausscheiden aus den Ämtern ist nur die halbe Wahrheit. Im Spiegel Interview (ab Minute 12!) berichtet Frau Merkel von 2 Dingen, die sie sich jetzt vorgenommen hat: mehr bewegen und mehr lesen. Das trifft es auf den Kopf.
Mehr bewegen, eben gerade in der Politik hätten sich Millionen von Deutschen gewünscht, dass sie mehr bewegt auf wichtigen Themen- und Politikfeldern. Überall da zum Beispiel, wo wir nun wissen, wir hinken hinterher: Klimaschutz, digitale und öffentliche Infrastruktur, Verteidigungssysteme, Bekämpfung von Ungleichheit, Steuergerechtigkeit, nachhaltigen Verkehr in Städten und auf dem Land, um nur einige zu nennen.
Mehr lesen, offenbart, das Hören auf Einflüsterer hatte einen hohen Stellenwert, scheinbar mehr, als das Erarbeiten einer eigenen Position durch Aktenstudium. Die Regierungskunst der Kanzlerin bestand hauptsächlich im geschickten Moderieren der unterschiedlichen Positionen innerhalb der Koalitionspartner, insbesondere auch mit der CSU. Im Rückblick heute kommen mir die 16 Regierungsjahre als Zeit der verpassten Chancen vor, aber die Bescheidenheit im Amt hat Deutschland gut gestanden. Das hat Olaf Scholz bei ihr abgeguckt, nur, ihr Nachfolger ist zu beherztem Handeln im Amt gezwungen. Das blieb Angela Merkel weitgehend erspart. Jetzt ist Bewegung gefragt, Aufholbewegung zunächst. Stillstand überwinden, Planungsverfahren verkürzen damit erneuerbare Energien sprießen. 
Ukraine Kultur
Einen wahrlich denkwürdigen Abend hat das Festival “Aus den Fugen” im Berliner Konzerthaus ermöglicht. Das “Youth Symphony Orchestra of Ukraine” ist zusammen mit Stars ukrainischer Herkunft am Samstag 26.11.2022 im großen Saal des Konzerthauses aufgetreten. Auf dem Programm stand zu Beginn vom Meister der Kunst der Fuge, J.S. Bach, das Streichquartett, “Verleih uns Frieden gnädiglich”, passend zur Vorweihnachtszeit. Rasch wird aber klar, dass der Überfall auf die Ukraine am 24.2.2022 die Welt für viele aus den Fugen geraten lies. “Die Zeit ist aus den Fugen” deklamierte bereits Hamlet. Erneut bestimmt Krieg und Kriegswirtschaft unsere Handlungen, geschuldet dem russischen Tyrannen, der versucht hat und weiterhin versucht, die ukrainische Kultur auszulöschen. Das Konzert des YSOU setzt weiterhin Zeichen, dass diese reichhaltige Kultur es wert ist, gehört und gesehen zu werden. Die Kompositionen von Mykola Lysenko, Suite über ukrainische Themen op2 oder die Arie der Nastia sind eindrucksvolle Beispiele der frühen Selbständigkeit der ukrainischen Musiktradition. Das Lied “Schtschedryk“, zum Mitsingen, als Abschluss des Konzerts wird lange nachhallen im großen Saal des Konzerthauses und bei dem begeisterten Publikum. Die Präzsion der Dirigentin Nataliia Stets ist beeindruckend und ihr kurzer Hinweis auf den “Holodomor” – den “genuzidalen Hungerstod in der Ukaine um 1932″ zwischen den Stücken, hilfreich für das Verständnis des ukrainischen Aufbäumens heute und das Gedenken an Völkermorde, besonders auch die von Deutschen begangenen. Dank auch an die Solistinnen des Abends, die die Jugend und das Publikum begeisterten. 